wrenb: (Gina's cocoa)
This morning I went on a green housekeeping book binge at the library in the hopes of finding something good to write a book review about for publication in my neighborhood newsletter. Let me tell you right now, The Lazy Environmentalist On A Budget by Josh Dorfman has not made the cut.
Care to read why? )
wrenb: (Gina's cocoa)
Organic Housekeeping by Ellen Sandbeck

I haven’t finished this book yet but I’m not sure I ever will. I borrowed it from a friend thinking that it would be a book full of Earth-friendly cleaning recipes. While it is Earth-friendly it is not a user-friendly book.

First of all, there are no clearly laid out recipes in Organic Housekeeping. A book like this ought to be able to be used as a ready reference. Got a tub with soap scum? Look up “bathtub” or “soap scum” in the index, and you should be able to quickly reference instructions. In this example the index references the following pages: “138-139, 145-56, 149-52, 154-55”. Notice how most of those overlap? If you scan the pages carefully you may find what you’re looking for, but it’s not going to be easy.

My other major complaint is the author’s use of scientific citations. As the proud recipient of a scientific education I feel that Sandbeck picks and chooses her references very carefully to validate her beliefs. While that is, to some degree, what we all do, the manner in which she does it grates. For example, this is part of her explanation for why she does not recommend the use of fabric softeners:
Rosalind Anderson, Ph.D., and Julius Anderson, MD, Ph.D., of Anderson Laboratories, Inc. published a study entitled “Respiratory Toxicity of Fabric Softener Emissions” in the May 2000 issue of The Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. When the doctors exposed laboratory mice to air that was contaminated with the fumes from fabric softener sheets, the rodents developed irritation of the eyes, nose, throat, and lungs, and some had severe asthma attacks.
Fine, she found a study that showed fabric softener sheets were toxic to mice. A brief scan of the paragraph shows that it was done by two self-employed scientists. We don’t know anything about their lab, it’s tagline might be “Slinging Mud At Big Corporations Since 1988”. A closer reading shows that the study was actually published in a journal which appears to be reputable. If Sandbeck had started her citation by mentioning the journal and followed it up with the names of the authors, no institution mentioned, my eye would only have picked up the journal. And at that point I might have been more likely to swallow the information that Sandbeck was attempting to convey. I know this is nit-picking, but it colors the feeling of the entire book. It seems that Sandbeck has strong opinions that she tries to prop up with carefully selected scientific studies.

This brings me to my last complaint. Ellen Sandbeck’s methods work for her, but I suspect that she is a long way from average. Her first chapter is very overwhelming. Before you get to any cleaning advice at all she states that you must organize and document every item in your home. A reader with a cluttered home, in need of housekeeping help, would probably drop this book onto a nearby pile and despair of ever getting their home clean.

In summary, I would skip Organic Housekeeping in favor of more succinct book such as Clean House, Clean Planet or even a something from another generation of housekeepers like Heloise.
wrenb: (Default)
Ok,  "Social Networking for books" makes it sound like all my books are going to get their own MySpace pages or something. What I'm actually talking about is Good Reads. A friend just mentioned it this afternoon, and I have been sucked in. It's a listing/book review site, but what I like is that it covers all books you've read, not just "books I own". So it looks to be a great source for book recommendations. Right now my book rec's come from reading [personal profile] naomikritzer, NPR, and dumb luck, so I'm excited to have a source that's easily searchable.

The site uses a very familiar friends system that's primarily organized by email address. I'm jenn at bernat dot net.

Now go read! :)
wrenb: (really neat stuff)
On Friday my MIL forwarded me an email about Barbara Kingsolver's new book, Animal, Vegetable, Miracle. Not an hour later I heard an interview with Kingsolver on WPR. I very rarely buy hardcovers, but I immediately made plans to pick up a copy at A Room of One's Own (indy feminist bookstore downtown).

Wow. I just started reading it last night. At lunchtime today I had to force myself back to work. It is well-written, well-thought out, sensible, and just plain cool. It's sort of The Omnivore's Dilemma, Phase 2: Implementation. A little over the top, because a really ordinary middle class family living on locally grown food might not make a great book. Kingsolver lives on a farmette, so I think they raised chickens and had a bunch of vegetable growing space. But still, it rocks.

And there are menus and recipes! I was left wondering about how to eat sustainably on a day to day basis when I finished reading The Omnivore's Dilemma. This book has the suggestions I was looking for.

Not that I'm anywhere near finished reading it. Their year-long experiment began in April, and I'm currently up to the May chapter. The only frustrating thing I've found so far is geographical. Kingsolver lives in Appalachia; I live in Wisconsin. She keeps talking about what month certain vegetables are available in rather than what portion of spring or summer. So I'm left feeling like the prime lettuce growing season has passed me by and my lettuces are just little seeds in my garden. In fact we're far enough behind that my vegetables will probably do just fine.

Go read this book! Then eat some local produce. :)

Profile

wrenb: (Default)
wrenb

March 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718 192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 13th, 2026 09:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios